**Server Question**
I'm thinking about clarifying our policy on posting random pictures (not: original content).
Basically, showing off something enticing is fine, with a comment and preferably with link to the source (where the creator/actor is going to be paid), but no endless strings of random pictures.
This is a kink community, not a stream of porn pics.
Opinions?
(Boost please for exposure)
@bedtimedrillsgt How will that impact those of us who follow such feeds from affiliated sites?
@arzhur not a problem at all, you can look and boost as much as you want.
I also wouldn't want people to think they aren't allowed to share what excites them. Still thinking about how this can be best phrased.
Am I making sense at all?
@bedtimedrillsgt You are, and it sounds like a fair and sensible policy. Maybe it can be more specifically worded toward pornbots, though? I think those might be the core of your concerns. Automated scripts that post an endless amount of porn without human intervention are what's really amplifying this phenomena.
@arzhur @bedtimedrillsgt what a coincidence, I started a similar conversation about bear.community today as well!
I agree with others that sharing 3rd party content is also a form of expression, although I do prefer putting proper pingback references on all posts, my biggest worry is profiles that simply dump a new photo every minute or so.
I believe that if the purpose is just to consume porn, there are better places for that. We all win if we also nurture a warm environment for interaction
@bedtimedrillsgt @arzhur for now I'm drafting some rules for silencing spammy/noisy accounts (you gave me one good threshold in this conversation, btw)
for our own members, I'm considering writing these as _guidelines_, not hard rules:
- do not flood the timeline with 3rd party photos
- when posting 3rd party content, try to put a link to the source
- when posting your own content, rules above don't apply (bc obviously)
I'm partial to posting 3rd party photos with no text. Granted, I would prefer to have people include some text along with the pictures, but it depends on the person. Sometimes there's nothing else to add, so 🤷 Besides, this is harder to apply as policy or guideline
For federated accounts, we'll only enforce the rule about silencing noisy/spammy accounts. They belong to different communities, in the end.
@bedtimedrillsgt @arzhur agreed, making the definition of flooding explicit will avoid some confusion down the line